[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH RFC tip/core/rcu 11/11] rcu: move TREE_RCU from softirq to kthread
On Wed, 23 Feb 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:

> These do introduce redundant preempt_disable()/preempt_enable() calls, but
> this is not on a fastpath, so should be OK, and the improved readability
> is certainly nice. The read and the write do need to happen on the same

this_cpu_xxx only use preempt_enable/disable() on platforms that do not
support per cpu atomic instructions. On x86 no preempt enable/disable will
be inserted.

You can also use the __this_cpu_xxx operations which never add preempt
disable/enable because they expect the caller to deal with preemption.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-23 20:25    [W:0.113 / U:1.400 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site