[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [patch 28/28] posix clocks: Introduce dynamic clocks
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 01:49:47PM -0800, john stultz wrote:
> I sort of worry about the naming collision with the term posix-clock, as
> this is just one type of posix clock (I suspect most folks think of a
> posix clock as the clockid passed to the existing posix api).
> Could we maybe use posix-dynclock or posix-fdclock or something? I know
> its already been changed from clkdev, so sorry for being finicky here
> and not catching this earlier.

A rose by any other name...

I agree that naming (even internal APIs) is important and have no
objection to changing the name. I did spend a bit of time considering
various alternatives, and now I'm out of ideas.

So, please do change the name if you have a better one.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-02 08:53    [W:0.244 / U:0.108 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site