[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2] altera_ps2: Add devicetree support
On 02/02/2011 11:38 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 02, 2011 at 07:48:58PM +0800, Thomas Chou wrote:
>> On 02/02/2011 12:31 PM, Grant Likely wrote:
>>>> +static const struct of_device_id altera_ps2_match[] = {
>>>> + { .compatible = "altr,ps2-1.0", },
>>> I thought I had seen 'altera' instead of an abbreviation being used in
>>> a previous patch. I don't care much whether 'altr' or 'altera' is
>>> used, but I'd like to know that there is consensus from the Altera
>>> users so that all the drivers use the same prefix.
>> We had discussed on nios2-dev mailing list, and decided to use
>> 'altr' as Walter suggested that it saves space.
>> About the documentation on dts binding, shall we have a single
>> altera.txt to describe all Altera related binding, and opencores.txt
>> to describe all OpenCores binding? Or separate file for each core in
>> its driver class?
> Since I'm reorganizing the binding documentation to reflect subsystems
> (bindings/spi, bindings/i2c, bindings/powerpc, etc) I'd prefer to see
> a separate file for each type of core.

OK. We will use separate files. I will send an updated patch to include
the dts binding.

As for nios2 cpu related binding, we shall use binding/nios2 dir. Right?

- Thomas

> Eventually, I'd like to define a record format for documenting
> bindings that can generate searchable and crosslinked output, but I've
> not spent any time looking at that seriously yet.
> g.
>> - Thomas

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-03 00:35    [W:0.057 / U:5.244 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site