lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
Patch in this message
/
SubjectRe: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/3] xen-pcifront: Sanity check the MSI/MSI-X values
From
Date
On Fri, 2011-02-18 at 14:08 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 08:53:40AM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-16 at 22:17 +0000, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> > > Check the returned vector values for any values that are
> > > odd or plain incorrect (say vector value zero), and if so
> > > print a warning. Also fixup the return values.
> > >
>
> How about this one (and there is a cleanup patch shortly following for the *(vector)...)
>
> From 631b743a5a587d195bf612112026eec8ea649344 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 13:43:22 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH 2/5] xen-pcifront: Sanity check the MSI/MSI-X values
>
> Check the returned vector values for any values that are
> odd or plain incorrect (say vector value zero), and if so
> print a warning. Also fixup the return values.
>
> This patch was precipiated by the Xen PCIBack returning the
> incorrect values due to how it was retrieving PIRQ values.
> This has been fixed in the xen-pciback by
> "xen/pciback: Utilize 'xen_pirq_from_irq' to get PIRQ value"
> patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
> ---
> drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++----
> 1 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> index 030ce37..d9fd1e0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/xen-pcifront.c
> @@ -277,18 +277,25 @@ static int pci_frontend_enable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev,
> if (likely(!err)) {
> if (likely(!op.value)) {
> /* we get the result */
> - for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++)
> + for (i = 0; i < nvec; i++) {
> + if (op.msix_entries[i].vector <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI-X entry %d" \
> + " is invalid: %d!\n", i,

String constants are not subject to the 80-column limit in these days
and the preference is to not split them to make them more greppable.

Otherwise:

Reviewed-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

> + op.msix_entries[i].vector);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + *(*vector+i) = -1;
> + continue;
> + }
> *(*vector+i) = op.msix_entries[i].vector;
> - return 0;
> + }
> } else {
> printk(KERN_DEBUG "enable msix get value %x\n",
> op.value);
> - return op.value;
> }
> } else {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "enable msix get err %x\n", err);
> - return err;
> }
> + return err;
> }
>
> static void pci_frontend_disable_msix(struct pci_dev *dev)
> @@ -325,6 +332,12 @@ static int pci_frontend_enable_msi(struct pci_dev *dev, int **vector)
> err = do_pci_op(pdev, &op);
> if (likely(!err)) {
> *(*vector) = op.value;
> + if (op.value <= 0) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "MSI entry is invalid: %d!\n",
> + op.value);
> + err = -EINVAL;
> + *(*vector) = -1;
> + }
> } else {
> dev_err(&dev->dev, "pci frontend enable msi failed for dev "
> "%x:%x\n", op.bus, op.devfn);




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-18 15:17    [W:0.045 / U:0.044 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site