Messages in this thread | | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | Date | Wed, 16 Feb 2011 14:29:25 -0800 | Subject | Re: [Patch] Revert block_dev read-only check |
| |
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 2:19 PM, Chuck Ebbert <cebbert@redhat.com> wrote: > This reverts commit 75f1dc0d076d1c1168f2115f1941ea627d38bd5a. The revert > could not be done automatically because changes after that commit > altered the code too much.
I really want to hear about _why_ something is reverted too. I'm not taking patches without explanations. And explaining that it's non-automatic (and why _that_ is), is not explaining why it needed to be reverted in the first place.
Please. Think of the poor people who wonder why..
Linus
| |