lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration

    * Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

    > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:35:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
    > > On 02/14/2011 11:30 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
    > > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:07:02AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
    > > >> Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip.
    > > >
    > > > Alright, fair enough.
    > > >
    > > >> BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master.
    > > >
    > > > Yeah, I saw a new patch going into the numa branch, but shouldn't this
    > > > and the next series based on x86/numa? That was how it was done with
    > > > the previous series.
    > >
    > > there is patch about init_memory_mapping_high() in tip/x86/bootmem.
    > > it will put pgtable on local nodes.
    >
    > Ingo, hpa, how do you guys want to handle this? Maybe you can cherry
    > pick or pull the branch into x86/numa?

    Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa tree, the current
    one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your tree. Also, i suspect you want to
    propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's into the commits?

    Thanks,

    Ingo


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-02-15 10:45    [W:0.032 / U:0.192 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site