lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration

* Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:35:06AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On 02/14/2011 11:30 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 11:07:02AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> Never mind. will send out patch after your patches get merged into tip.
> > >
> > > Alright, fair enough.
> > >
> > >> BTW, you may need to rebase your on top of tip/master.
> > >
> > > Yeah, I saw a new patch going into the numa branch, but shouldn't this
> > > and the next series based on x86/numa? That was how it was done with
> > > the previous series.
> >
> > there is patch about init_memory_mapping_high() in tip/x86/bootmem.
> > it will put pgtable on local nodes.
>
> Ingo, hpa, how do you guys want to handle this? Maybe you can cherry
> pick or pull the branch into x86/numa?

Would be nice to have a version against the latest tip:x86/numa tree, the current
one conflicts in arch/x86/mm/numa_64.c with your tree. Also, i suspect you want to
propagate Yinghai's Acked-by's into the commits?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-15 10:45    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans