lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC 1/2 -tip/master] x86, x2apic: minimize IPI register writes using cluster groups

* Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 02/14/2011 02:45 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Cyrill Gorcunov<gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >>In the case of x2apic cluster mode we can group IPI register writes based on the
> >>cluster group instead of individual per-cpu destiantion messages. This reduces the
> >>apic register writes and reduces the amount of IPI messages (in the best case we
> >>can reduce it by a factor of 16).
> >>
> >>With this change, microbenchmark measuring the cost of flush_tlb_others(), with
> >>the flush tlb IPI being sent from a cpu in the socket-1 to all the logical cpus in
> >>socket-2 (on a Westmere-EX system that has 20 logical cpus in a socket) is 3x
> >>times better now (compared to the former 'send one-by-one' algorithm).
> >
> >Pretty nice!
> >
> >I have a few structural and nitpicking comments:
>
> Thanks a lot for review, Ingo! I'll address all the nits during this week.
>
> ...
> >
> >>+void x2apic_init_cpu_notifier(void)
> >>+{
> >>+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> >>
> >>+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>+ zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(ipi_mask, cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
> >>+ BUG_ON(!per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu) || !per_cpu(ipi_mask, cpu));
> >
> >Such a BUG_ON() is not particularly user friendly - and this could trigger during
> >CPU hotplug events, i.e. while the system is fully booted up, right?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >
> > Ingo
>
> Yup is not that much friendly but it's called during system bootup,
> hotplug events are handled by
>
> +static int __cpuinit
> +cluster_setup(struct notifier_block *nfb, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
> +{
> + unsigned int cpu = (unsigned long)hcpu;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + switch (action) {
> + case CPU_UP_PREPARE:
> + zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + zalloc_cpumask_var(&per_cpu(ipi_mask, cpu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu) || !per_cpu(ipi_mask, cpu)) {
> + free_cpumask_var(per_cpu(cpus_in_cluster, cpu));
> + free_cpumask_var(per_cpu(ipi_mask, cpu));
> + err = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + break;
>
> so it returns -ENOMEM if failed. And btw just noted that we forgot to make
> x2apic_init_cpu_notifier being in __init section.
>
> Or I miss something?

Is there no GFP_NOFAIL or GFP_FAIL_ON_PANIC variant that could be used the 'must not
fail' property of the boot-time allocation?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-15 04:25    [W:0.047 / U:1.436 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site