[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 15/26] x86-64, NUMA: Unify the rest of memblk registration
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 3:32 AM, Tejun Heo <> wrote:
> Hello,
> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 04:45:27PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> please don't put setup_node_bootmem calling into numa_register_memblks()
>> that is not related.
>> put the calling in initmem_init() directly is more reasonable.
> No, I don't think so.  If you don't like the function name, let's
> change the name.  I think it's better to put all registrations there.
> Later in the series but function is changed to deal with struct
> numa_meminfo anyway so maybe it's better to rename it to
> numa_register_meminfo().

No, I don't like ***_register_*** take care of calling setup_bootmem.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-14 17:11    [W:0.087 / U:23.432 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site