lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 03/10] Add yaffs2 file system: checkpoint streaming
On 02/11/2011 11:27 AM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Feb 2011, Charles Manning wrote:
>
>> Signed-off-by: Charles Manning <cdhmanning@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c | 408 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.h | 33 ++++
>> 2 files changed, 441 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
>> create mode 100644 fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.h
>>
>> diff --git a/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..997a618
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/fs/yaffs2/yaffs_checkptrw.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,408 @@
>> +/*
>> + * YAFFS: Yet Another Flash File System. A NAND-flash specific file system.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (C) 2002-2011 Aleph One Ltd.
>> + * for Toby Churchill Ltd and Brightstar Engineering
>> + *
>> + * Created by Charles Manning <charles@aleph1.co.uk>
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify
>> + * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 as
>> + * published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include "yaffs_checkptrw.h"
>> +#include "yaffs_getblockinfo.h"
>> +
>> +static int yaffs2_checkpt_space_ok(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int blocks_avail = dev->n_erased_blocks - dev->param.n_reserved_blocks;
>> +
>> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
>> + "checkpt blocks_avail = %d", blocks_avail);
>> +
>> + return (blocks_avail <= 0) ? 0 : 1;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int yaffs_checkpt_erase(struct yaffs_dev *dev)
>> +{
>> + int i;
>> +
>> + if (!dev->param.erase_fn)
>> + return 0;
>> + yaffs_trace(YAFFS_TRACE_CHECKPOINT,
>> + "checking blocks %d to %d",
>> + dev->internal_start_block, dev->internal_end_block);
>> +
>> + for (i = dev->internal_start_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block; i++) {
>
> Why does 'i' need 'function scope'? can't it just have 'for scope'?
>
> for (int i = dev->internal_start_block; i <= dev->internal_end_block; i++) {

Because we don't do that in kernel code.

ryan@okiwi:linux-2.6$ grep "for (int" * -R | wc -l
16
Those sixteen should be fixed :-). Half of them are in drivers/staging.

~Ryan

--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre

Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan@bluewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-10 23:47    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans