lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 08/10] ptrace: participate in group stop from ptrace_stop() iff the task is trapping for group stop
On 01/28, Roland McGrath wrote:
>
> If
> there is a group stop in progress but not yet complete, then PTRACE_CONT
> on a thread in the group should probably just move it from TASK_TRACED
> to TASK_STOPPED without resuming it at all.
>
> Once a group stop is complete, then probably the ideal is that
> PTRACE_CONT would not resume a thread until a real SIGCONT cleared the
> job control stop condition.

Well. I agree. I even tried to mention this before.

Or, if PTRACE_CONT resumes the tracee it should clear SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED.

> But it's likely that existing ptrace users
> have expectations contrary to that,

Sure ;)




Btw. I just realized that I didn't reply explicitly to this series.
Because I thought we already discussed everything and I have nothing
to add. I think that everything is technically correct. I mean, I
believe the patches do exactly what the changelog says.

Oleg.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-01 20:47    [W:0.125 / U:9.548 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site