lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Feb]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Locking in the clk API, part 2: clk_prepare/clk_unprepare
On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:14:18PM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 03:00:24PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 01, 2011 at 10:05:56PM +0900, Jassi Brar wrote:
> > > 2011/2/1 Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>:
> > >
> > > .....
> > >
> > > > Do you plan to handle the case that clk_enable is called while prepare
> > > > isn't completed (considering the special case "not called at all")?
> > > > Maybe BUG_ON(clk->ops->prepare && !clk->prepare_count)?
> > > Sounds better than the second option.
> > >
> > > > Alternatively don't force the sleep in clk_prepare (e.g. by protecting
> > > > prepare_count by a spinlock (probably enable_lock)) and call clk_prepare
> > > > before calling clk->ops->enable?
> > > That might result in a driver working on some platforms(those have
> > > atomic clk_prepare)
> > > and not on others(those have sleeping).
> > The first option has the same result. E.g. on some platforms
> > clk->ops->prepare might be NULL, on others it's not.
>
> If clk->ops->prepare is NULL, then clk_prepare() better return success
> as it should mean "no preparation necessary", not "someone didn't
> implement it so its an error".
>
> Calling clk->ops->enable() with a spinlock held will ensure that no one
> tries to make that method sleep, so if people want sleeping stuff they
> have to use the clk_prepare() stuff. It's a self-enforcing API which
> ensures that we don't get sleeping stuff inside clk_enable().
>
> And with a check in clk_enable() for a preparation, it helps to ensure
> that drivers do call clk_prepare() before clk_enable() - though it can't
> guarantee it in every case.
Full ack. (I wonder if you misunderstood me or wanted to put my
statement into more words. Jassi didn't like that a clk_enable without
a previous clk_prepare worked on some platforms and on others it
doesn't. With BUG_ON(clk->ops->prepare && !clk->prepare_count) in
clk_enable we have exactly this situation.)

Best regards
Uwe


--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-02-01 16:25    [W:0.125 / U:13.164 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site