Messages in this thread | | | From | Dong Aisheng-B29396 <> | Subject | RE: [RFC PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx6q support | Date | Wed, 7 Dec 2011 09:18:36 +0000 |
| |
> -----Original Message----- > From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org] > Sent: Wednesday, December 07, 2011 5:10 PM > To: Dong Aisheng-B29396; Guo Shawn-R65073 > Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; > linus.walleij@stericsson.com; s.hauer@pengutronix.de; > kernel@pengutronix.de > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx6q support > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 8:23 AM, Dong Aisheng-B29396 <B29396@freescale.com> > wrote: > >> From: Guo Shawn-R65073 > >> As I do not see the device tree probing added in pinmux-imx-core.c, I > >> expect the patch has not got the chance to run on imx6, right? > >> > > Yes, I would add it if the pinctrl framework supports DT. > > There are many levels of DT. > > You can of course add DT-support for anything driver-specific, such as > init data for some registers, or anything else you would normally pass in > through platform data. So please just do that if imx6 already has support > for such things. > > What we're discussing about right now on devicetree-discuss is where to > put the mapping tables etc that is currently registered by the board, > that has no obvious solution as there is some disagreement on how to do > that. > Yes, thanks for your info. I'm new to device tree and may take some time to get more familiar with it.
I discussed with Shawn today and now we're going to move data to dt and run this driver on mx6q first.
Regards Dong Aisheng
| |