Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:09:13 -0800 | From | Saravana Kannan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework |
| |
On 11/24/2011 12:43 AM, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Saravana Kannan > <skannan@codeaurora.org> wrote: >> remoteproc would probably be the best fit since it's already used in the >> code and people are used to discussing about it. > > Guys you realize that 'amp' isn't really being used in the code > itself; this discussion boils down to the text we have in the patches' > subject line and the top level Kconfig/folder entry :) > > But, sure, I'll just drop those 'amp' text instances, and we'll have > 'remoteproc' and 'rpmsg' as separate top-level frameworks again. > > Thanks, > Ohad.
Yes, I did realize it's not used in the code. I just wanted to prevent what I considered a misuse of "AMP". Thanks for accommodating my request.
-Saravana
-- Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
| |