lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/2] of/irq: Get rid of NO_IRQ usage
On 11/10/2011 09:25 AM, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
> PPC32/64 defines NO_IRQ to zero, so no problems expected.
> ARM defines NO_IRQ to -1, but OF code relies on IRQ domains support,
> which returns correct ('0') value in 'no irq' case. So everything
> should be fine.
>
> Other arches might break if some of their OF drivers rely on NO_IRQ
> being not 0. If so, the drivers must be fixed, finally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/of/irq.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++------------
> 1 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/of/irq.c b/drivers/of/irq.c
> index 6d3dd39..2dd4937 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/irq.c
> +++ b/drivers/of/irq.c
> @@ -26,11 +26,6 @@
> #include <linux/string.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
>
> -/* For archs that don't support NO_IRQ (such as x86), provide a dummy value */
> -#ifndef NO_IRQ
> -#define NO_IRQ 0
> -#endif
> -
> /**
> * irq_of_parse_and_map - Parse and map an interrupt into linux virq space
> * @device: Device node of the device whose interrupt is to be mapped
> @@ -42,12 +37,23 @@
> unsigned int irq_of_parse_and_map(struct device_node *dev, int index)
> {
> struct of_irq oirq;
> + int ret = 0;
>
> if (of_irq_map_one(dev, index, &oirq))
> - return NO_IRQ;
> -
> - return irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
> - oirq.size);
> + goto no_irq;
> +
> + ret = irq_create_of_mapping(oirq.controller, oirq.specifier,
> + oirq.size);
> +no_irq:
> +#ifdef NO_IRQ
> +#if NO_IRQ != 0
> + if (ret == NO_IRQ)
> + pr_warn("Hit NO_IRQ case for your arch. Drivers might expect "
> + "NO_IRQ, but we return 0. If anything breaks, driver "
> + "have to be fixed.\n");
> +#endif
> +#endif

This warning code is really ugly. Can we just drop it? In my searching
of in kernel dts files, there's only 1 instance I have found (Versatile
AB watchdog) that would hit this.

If not, you don't need to handle irq_create_of_mapping return as that is
already always 0 for no irq or error.

Otherwise, looks fine.

Rob

> + return ret;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(irq_of_parse_and_map);
>
> @@ -345,7 +351,7 @@ int of_irq_to_resource(struct device_node *dev, int index, struct resource *r)
>
> /* Only dereference the resource if both the
> * resource and the irq are valid. */
> - if (r && irq != NO_IRQ) {
> + if (r && irq) {
> r->start = r->end = irq;
> r->flags = IORESOURCE_IRQ;
> r->name = dev->full_name;
> @@ -363,7 +369,7 @@ int of_irq_count(struct device_node *dev)
> {
> int nr = 0;
>
> - while (of_irq_to_resource(dev, nr, NULL) != NO_IRQ)
> + while (of_irq_to_resource(dev, nr, NULL))
> nr++;
>
> return nr;
> @@ -383,7 +389,7 @@ int of_irq_to_resource_table(struct device_node *dev, struct resource *res,
> int i;
>
> for (i = 0; i < nr_irqs; i++, res++)
> - if (of_irq_to_resource(dev, i, res) == NO_IRQ)
> + if (!of_irq_to_resource(dev, i, res))
> break;
>
> return i;



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-06 22:25    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans