lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH] ARM: kirkwood: Remove eSATA SheevaPlug board support
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011, Tixy wrote:

> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 13:00 -0500, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> > On Sat, 3 Dec 2011, Tixy wrote:
> > > [PATCH] Fix machine_is_xxx() naming for eSata SheevaPlug and QNAP TS-209
> > >
> > > The eSata SheevaPlug and QNAP TS-209 devices were removed from
> > > mach-types due to naming mismatches between machine_is_xxx(), CONFIG_XXX
> > > and MACH_TYPE_XXX.
> > >
> > > This patch fixes those mismatches and adds the devices back into
> > > mach-types.
> > >
> > > Cc: Nicolas Pitre <nico@fluxnic.net>
> > > Cc: Lennert Buytenhek <kernel@wantstofly.org>
> > > Cc: Russell King <linux@arm.linux.org.uk>
> > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy@yxit.co.uk>
> >
> > Acked-by: Nicolas Pitre <nico@linaro.org>
> >
> > Obviously, the change to mach-types should be done in the machine
> > registry database as well by RMK.
>
> Which tree should this go through? Russell's or arm-soc?

The arm-soc tree is probably more appropriate. Don't include the
mach-types changes though as it is preferable if they come through RMK's
database updates.


Nicolas


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-06 20:47    [W:0.067 / U:0.412 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site