Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 5 Dec 2011 10:47:18 +0100 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 00/10] [GIT PULL] tracing: various fixes |
| |
* Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 10:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > Hm, not all were regression fixes and the branch was named > > */core so i took it into perf/core. > > Yeah it happened just at the end of the merge window. I didn't really > know what branch to name it. > > > > > Could you perhaps cherry-pick the most crutial regression > > fixes into an urgent branch? We could still push that > > upstream. > > Looking at each patch, I would say 6 of the ten need to go in. > Most are marked as stable since they break the last tree. I > could just send them all to stable if it seems strange to have > this many patches in two pull requests.
We can cherry-pick those 6 patches into perf/urgent - just make sure you merge the cherry-picked branch into your devel branch before adding new changes to the same files, there will be tons of conflicts otherwise.
Thanks,
Ingo
| |