lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [5]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRE: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support
Date
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Linus Walleij [mailto:linus.walleij@linaro.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2011 1:01 AM
> To: Sascha Hauer
> Cc: Dong Aisheng-B29396; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel@lists.infradead.org; linus.walleij@stericsson.com; Guo Shawn-
> R65073; kernel@pengutronix.de
> Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/3] pinctrl: imx: add pinmux-imx53 support
>
> On Sun, Dec 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
> wrote:
>
> > I don't think that this grouping of pads to their functions makes
> > sense. On i.MX every pad is muxed independently and not in groups.
> > Which pins belong to which function is board specific and not SoC
> > specific.
>
> True, Dong can this be moved to the imx pinctrl platform data and passed
> in from arch/arm/[plat|mach]-* board files instead?
> That is probably where it belongs today.
>
Yes, I will do that.

> I know that this data is in drivers/pinctrl for the U300 and SIRF, but
> that is because they only have one single board variant.
>
> Yours,
> Linus Walleij

Regards
Dong Aisheng



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-06 04:45    [W:0.072 / U:6.492 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site