Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 05 Dec 2011 22:20:03 +0100 | | From | Andreas Oberritter <> | | Subject | Re: [RFC] vtunerc: virtual DVB device - is it ok to NACK driver because of worrying about possible misusage? |
| |
On 05.12.2011 21:55, Alan Cox wrote: > The USB case is quite different because your latency is very tightly > bounded, your dead device state is rigidly defined, and your loss of > device is accurately and immediately signalled. > > Quite different.
How can usbip work if networking and usb are so different and what's so different between vtunerc and usbip, that made it possible to put usbip into drivers/staging?
Regards, Andreas
|  |