Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 03 Dec 2011 21:50:50 +0530 | From | "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <> | Subject | Re: 3.2.0-rc4+ (Linus GIT af968e29acd91ebeb4224e899202c46c93171ecd) -- Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): |
| |
On 12/03/2011 09:07 PM, Miles Lane wrote:
> Thanks! The patch worked perfectly. > > Miles
Thanks a lot for testing Miles!
Regards, Srivatsa S. Bhat
> > On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Srivatsa S. Bhat > <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> On 12/03/2011 09:22 AM, Miles Lane wrote: >> >>> While reading a file in sysfs, I suspended tried to suspend the machine and got: >>> >>> [ 1058.644957] PM: Syncing filesystems ... done. >>> [ 1059.670167] Freezing user space processes ... >>> [ 1079.681175] Freezing of tasks failed after 20.01 seconds (1 tasks >>> refusing to freeze, wq_busy=0): >>> [ 1079.682077] head D ffff88013a753680 5328 9761 9402 0x00800004 >>> [ 1079.682086] ffff88011b15fd28 0000000000000046 0000000000000006 >>> ffffffff8160d020 >>> [ 1079.682095] ffff880100000000 ffff88013a7532d0 ffff88011b15ffd8 >>> ffff88011b15ffd8 >>> [ 1079.682102] 0000000000010bc0 ffff88013a7532d0 ffffffff81372d96 >>> 000000013a7532d0 >>> [ 1079.682110] Call Trace: >>> [ 1079.682120] [<ffffffff81372d96>] ? __mutex_lock_common+0x26e/0x41e >>> [ 1079.682126] [<ffffffff8137241a>] schedule+0x55/0x57 >>> [ 1079.682131] [<ffffffff81372dbf>] __mutex_lock_common+0x297/0x41e >>> [ 1079.682137] [<ffffffff810c675d>] ? lock_memory_hotplug+0x20/0x22 >>> [ 1079.682142] [<ffffffff810c675d>] ? lock_memory_hotplug+0x20/0x22 >>> [ 1079.682149] [<ffffffff8137302d>] mutex_lock_nested+0x36/0x3b >>> [ 1079.682153] [<ffffffff810c675d>] lock_memory_hotplug+0x20/0x22 >> >> >> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> Wow! There, Tejun, did you see that? That is just what we fixed in >> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/21/334 !! :-) >> >> But since Rafael kept it for the next merge window, we hit this failure >> in 3.2-rc4. >> >> Well, atleast for once I am feeling extremely happy that we *actually* >> fixed a problem _before_ hitting it! :-) >> >> Miles, thanks for the report. Can you please try the patch given in the >> above link? >> >>> [ 1079.682160] [<ffffffff810c53e7>] show_slab_objects+0xfc/0x1e5 >>> [ 1079.682166] [<ffffffff810c550e>] partial_show+0xe/0x10 >>> [ 1079.682171] [<ffffffff810c23b7>] slab_attr_show+0x1d/0x21 >>> [ 1079.682177] [<ffffffff811235c9>] sysfs_read_file+0xb7/0x13c >>> [ 1079.682183] [<ffffffff810ccdd3>] vfs_read+0xa0/0xc7 >>> [ 1079.682188] [<ffffffff810ce0d3>] ? fget_light+0x35/0x97 >>> [ 1079.682194] [<ffffffff810cce3f>] sys_read+0x45/0x69 >>> [ 1079.682199] [<ffffffff81378d3b>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b >>> >> >>
| |