lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH 0/4] Gang scheduling in CFS
From
Date
On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 14:03 +0530, Nikunj A. Dadhania wrote:
> The following patches implements gang scheduling. These patches
> are *highly* experimental in nature and are not proposed for
> inclusion at this time.

Nor will they ever be, I've always strongly opposed the whole concept
and I'm not about to change my mind. Gang scheduling is a scalability
nightmare.

> Gang scheduling can be helpful in virtualization scenario. It will
> help in avoiding the lock-holder-preemption[1] problem and other
> benefits include improved lock-acquisition times. This feature
> will help address some limitations of KVM on Power

Use paravirt ticket locks or a pause-loop-filter like thing.

> On Power, we have an interesting hardware restriction on guests
> running across SMT theads: on any single core, we can only run one
> mm context at any given time.

OMFG are your hardware engineers insane?

Anyway, I had a look at your patches and I don't see how could ever
work. You gang-schedule cgroup entities, but there's no guarantee the
load-balancer will have at least one task for each group on every cpu.




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-19 16:55    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans