[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the cputime tree
On Mon, 19 Dec 2011 15:08:43 +0100
Peter Zijlstra <> wrote:

> On Mon, 2011-12-19 at 13:31 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
> > Just one question: are you sure that you want the cpustat array
> > to be u64 instead of cputime64_t? The content of the cpustat array is defined
> > by the architecture semantics of cputime64_t, for CONFIG_VIRT_CPU_ACCOUNTING=y
> > this is not a jiffy counter. If the array is u64 we won't get the sparse
> > checking when reading from cpustat.
> So as Glauber said the reason was that we wanted to use simply
> operators, and IIRC he wanted to add a few fields that had to be u64.
> I'm not sure what the current plans are wrt adding more fields, but with
> your work cputime_t should again be a simple type and thus regular math
> operators should work again, right?


blue skies,

"Reality continues to ruin my life." - Calvin.

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-19 15:27    [W:0.044 / U:1.216 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site