Messages in this thread | | | From | Rusty Russell <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 10/15] module_param: make bool parameters really bool (core code) | Date | Mon, 19 Dec 2011 12:50:59 +1030 |
| |
On Fri, 16 Dec 2011 11:58:30 -0800, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: > On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 01:43:24PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote: > > module_param(bool) used to counter-intuitively take an int. In > > fddd5201 (mid-2009) we allowed bool or int/unsigned int using a messy > > trick. > > > > It's time to remove the int/unsigned int option. For this version > > it'll simply give a warning, but it'll break next kernel version. > > > > Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> > > For the rcutorture component: > > Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > Tested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > Given that this portion of the patch is self-sufficient, I have queued > the rcutorture portion of this patch with your signed-off-by, which I > can push for either 3.3 or 3.4 (default is most likely 3.4). Of course, > if you would prefer some other approach, please let me know.
Nope, more than happy. Have removed it from my patch.
Cheers, Rusty.
| |