[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [15]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v9 0/9] Request for inclusion: per-cgroup tcp memory pressure controls
    On 12/15/2011 09:48 AM, David Miller wrote:
    > From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki<>
    > Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 14:40:19 +0900
    >> I met this bug at _1st_ run. Please enable _all_ debug options!.
    > Plus the CONFIG_NET=n and other build failures.
    > This patch series was seriously rushed, and very poorly handled.
    > Yet I kept getting so much pressure to review, comment upon, and
    > ultimately apply these patches. Never, ever, do this to me ever
    > again.
    > If I don't feel your patches are high priority enough or ready enough
    > for me to review, then TOO BAD. Don't ask people to pressure me or
    > get my attention. Instead, ask others for help and do testing before
    > wasting MY time and crapping up MY tree.
    > I should have noticed a red flag when I have James Bottomly asking me
    > to look at these patches, I should have pushed back. Instead, I
    > relented, and now I'm very seriously regretting it.
    > All the regressions in the net-next tree over the past several days
    > have been due to this patch set, and this patch set alone.
    > This code wasn't ready and needed, at a minimum, several more weeks of
    > work before being put in.
    > Instead, we're going to bandaid patch it up after the fact, rather
    > than just letting these changes mature naturally during the review
    > process.
    Hi Dave,

    You are right about all points. I will admit to it, face it, and
    apologize it.
    I guess the best I can do right now is fix whatever you guys point me to
    and not repeat it in the future.


     \ /
      Last update: 2011-12-15 07:51    [W:0.097 / U:1.436 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site