[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRE: [PATCH 1/6] HWPOISON: clean up memory_failure() vs. __memory_failure()
> > >  	printk(KERN_ERR "Action optional memory failure at %lx ignored\n", pfn);
> >
> > Btw., while at it, could we phrase this message in a more
> > obvious way to users, such as 'Non-fatal memory failure at
> > %lx ignored'?
> Yeah, that's might not be as correct as we want it to be. AO
> means it is an uncorrectable error, i.e. it will become fatal
> if we'd consumed it, but it isn't that now because we just saw
> it passing by in the cacheline...
> Maybe "Fatal, unconsumed error ignored..."

The overall meaning is "land mine seen but not stepped on yet"

I'll see if I can wordsmith the message to convey that.


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-14 18:25    [W:0.053 / U:1.048 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site