lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [12]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/3] pinctrl: Don't create a device for each pin controller
From
On Sat, Dec 10, 2011 at 12:59 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> wrote:

> Pin controllers should already be instantiated as a device, so there's
> no need for the pinctrl core to create a new struct device for each
> controller.
>
> This allows the controller's real name to be used in the mux mapping
> table, rather than e.g. "pinctrl.0", "pinctrl.1", etc.

Hey cool, this "just works" on U300!

And it is what we want for future device tree work I highly suspect.

I'll push the change to linux-next!

Thanks,
Linus Walleij


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-12 13:55    [W:0.037 / U:0.092 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site