Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Mon, 12 Dec 2011 20:48:02 +0800 | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] mm: memcg: keep root group unchanged if fail to create new | | From | Hillf Danton <> |
| |
Hello Hugh
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 7:39 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com> wrote: > On Sun, 11 Dec 2011, Hillf Danton wrote: > >> If the request is not to create root group and we fail to meet it, >> we'd leave the root unchanged. > > I didn't understand that at first: please say "we should" rather > than "we'd", which I take to be an abbreviation for "we would". >
Thanks for correcting me.
> > I wonder what was going through the author's mind when he wrote it > that way? I wonder if it's one of those bugs that creeps in when > you start from a perfectly functional patch, then make refinements > to suit feedback from reviewers. >
Actually no such a perfectly functional patch, but I also wonder if you are likely to post and/or share your current todo list if any, then many could learn the right direction, and in turn you comment and pull acceptable works in that direction, like Linus.
Hillf -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|  |