lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH V2] vmscan/trace: Add 'active' and 'file' info to trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate.
From
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> wrote:
> On 12/12/2011 08:59 AM, Minchan Kim wrote:
>> Hi Tao,
>>
>> On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 11:46 PM, Tao Ma <tm@tao.ma> wrote:
>>> From: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>>
>>> In trace_mm_vmscan_lru_isolate, we don't output 'active' and 'file'
>>> information to the trace event and it is a bit inconvenient for the
>>> user to get the real information(like pasted below).
>>> mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=2 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32
>>> nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0
>>>
>>> So this patch adds these 2 info to the trace event and it now looks like:
>>> mm_vmscan_lru_isolate: isolate_mode=2 order=0 nr_requested=32 nr_scanned=32
>>> nr_taken=32 contig_taken=0 contig_dirty=0 contig_failed=0 active=1 file=0
>>>
>>> Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
>>> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
>>> Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
>>> Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> Cc: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
>>> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
>>> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tao Ma <boyu.mt@taobao.com>
>>> ---
>>>  include/trace/events/vmscan.h |   25 +++++++++++++++++--------
>>>  mm/memcontrol.c               |    2 +-
>>>  mm/vmscan.c                   |    6 +++---
>>>  3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>>> index edc4b3d..82bc49c 100644
>>> --- a/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>>> +++ b/include/trace/events/vmscan.h
>>> @@ -266,9 +266,10 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
>>> -               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode),
>>> +               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode,
>>> +               int active, int file),
>>>
>>> -       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode),
>>> +       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode, active, file),
>>>
>>>        TP_STRUCT__entry(
>>>                __field(int, order)
>>> @@ -279,6 +280,8 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
>>>                __field(unsigned long, nr_lumpy_dirty)
>>>                __field(unsigned long, nr_lumpy_failed)
>>>                __field(isolate_mode_t, isolate_mode)
>>> +               __field(int, active)
>>> +               __field(int, file)
>>>        ),
>>>
>>>        TP_fast_assign(
>>> @@ -290,9 +293,11 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
>>>                __entry->nr_lumpy_dirty = nr_lumpy_dirty;
>>>                __entry->nr_lumpy_failed = nr_lumpy_failed;
>>>                __entry->isolate_mode = isolate_mode;
>>> +               __entry->active = active;
>>> +               __entry->file = file;
>>>        ),
>>>
>>> -       TP_printk("isolate_mode=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_taken=%lu contig_taken=%lu contig_dirty=%lu contig_failed=%lu",
>>> +       TP_printk("isolate_mode=%d order=%d nr_requested=%lu nr_scanned=%lu nr_taken=%lu contig_taken=%lu contig_dirty=%lu contig_failed=%lu active=%d file=%d",
>>>                __entry->isolate_mode,
>>>                __entry->order,
>>>                __entry->nr_requested,
>>> @@ -300,7 +305,9 @@ DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template,
>>>                __entry->nr_taken,
>>>                __entry->nr_lumpy_taken,
>>>                __entry->nr_lumpy_dirty,
>>> -               __entry->nr_lumpy_failed)
>>> +               __entry->nr_lumpy_failed,
>>> +               __entry->active,
>>> +               __entry->file)
>>>  );
>>>
>>>  DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>>> @@ -312,9 +319,10 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_lru_isolate,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
>>> -               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode),
>>> +               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode,
>>> +               int active, int file),
>>>
>>> -       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
>>> +       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode, active, file)
>>>
>>>  );
>>>
>>> @@ -327,9 +335,10 @@ DEFINE_EVENT(mm_vmscan_lru_isolate_template, mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_dirty,
>>>                unsigned long nr_lumpy_failed,
>>> -               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode),
>>> +               isolate_mode_t isolate_mode,
>>> +               int active, int file),
>>>
>>> -       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode)
>>> +       TP_ARGS(order, nr_requested, nr_scanned, nr_taken, nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed, isolate_mode, active, file)
>>>
>>>  );
>>>
>>> diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> index 6aff93c..246fbce 100644
>>> --- a/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> +++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
>>> @@ -1249,7 +1249,7 @@ unsigned long mem_cgroup_isolate_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>>>        *scanned = scan;
>>>
>>>        trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_isolate(0, nr_to_scan, scan, nr_taken,
>>> -                                     0, 0, 0, mode);
>>> +                                     0, 0, 0, mode, active, file);
>>>
>>>        return nr_taken;
>>>  }
>>> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> index f54a05b..97955ca 100644
>>> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
>>> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
>>> @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ int __isolate_lru_page(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode, int file)
>>>  static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>>>                struct list_head *src, struct list_head *dst,
>>>                unsigned long *scanned, int order, isolate_mode_t mode,
>>> -               int file)
>>> +               int active, int file)
>>>  {
>>>        unsigned long nr_taken = 0;
>>>        unsigned long nr_lumpy_taken = 0;
>>> @@ -1221,7 +1221,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_lru_pages(unsigned long nr_to_scan,
>>>                        nr_to_scan, scan,
>>>                        nr_taken,
>>>                        nr_lumpy_taken, nr_lumpy_dirty, nr_lumpy_failed,
>>> -                       mode);
>>> +                       mode, active, file);
>>>        return nr_taken;
>>>  }
>>>
>>> @@ -1237,7 +1237,7 @@ static unsigned long isolate_pages_global(unsigned long nr,
>>>        if (file)
>>>                lru += LRU_FILE;
>>>        return isolate_lru_pages(nr, &z->lru[lru].list, dst, scanned, order,
>>> -                                                               mode, file);
>>> +                                                       mode, active, file);
>>
>> I guess you want to count exact scanning number of which lru list.
>> But It's impossible now since we do lumpy reclaim so that trace's
>> result is mixed by active/inactive list scanning.
>> And I don't like adding new argument for just trace although it's trivial.
> yeah, I know we do lumpy reclaim, but it has no hint about whether it is
> a file or anon lru. So I think we at least need a 'file=[0/1]' in this
> trace event.
>>
>> I think 'mode' is more proper rather than  specific 'active'.
>> The 'mode' can achieve your goal without passing new argument "active".
> sorry, but how can we find the real relationship between 'mode' and
> 'active'? I am not quite familiar with this field. So if you can
> explicit describe it, I am fine to drop this field.


mode is following as,

/* Isolate inactive pages */
#define ISOLATE_INACTIVE ((__force fmode_t)0x1)
/* Isolate active pages */
#define ISOLATE_ACTIVE ((__force fmode_t)0x2)
/* Isolate clean file */
#define ISOLATE_CLEAN ((__force fmode_t)0x4)
/* Isolate unmapped file */
#define ISOLATE_UNMAPPED ((__force fmode_t)0x8)

For example,

If mode is 0x1, it means we are isolating inactive.
If mode is 0x2, it means we are isolating active.
If mode is 0x4|0x2, it mean we are isolating clear pages in active list.
If mode is 0x8|0x2, it mean we are isolate unmapped page in active list.



--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-12 02:25    [W:0.091 / U:0.116 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site