lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: linux-next bad Kconfig for drivers/hid
    On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 12:21:16AM +0100, Jiri Kosina wrote:
    > On Thu, 8 Dec 2011, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
    > >
    > > Hm. How about making it "depends on HID && POWER_SUPPLY"? I think that
    > > would needlessly disable it if HID is also modular, but I'm not sure how
    > > to fix that. "depends on HID && POWER_SUPPLY && HID == POWER_SUPPLY"?

    That would work, but I think technically I think you could end up with
    HID=m and POWER_SUPPLY=m which would still allow HID_BATTERY_STRENGTH=y
    which is the same problem.

    I don't know what kind of .config contortions you'd need to do to get
    there.

    > How about making it 'default POWER_SUPPLY' instead?

    By itself that wont help as POWER_SUPPLY=m statisfies.

    So it looks like we have Jeremy's:
    HID && POWER_SUPPLY && HID == POWER_SUPPLY
    or my:
    POWER_SUPPLY=y

    Yours Tony
    [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-12-12 01:33    [W:0.020 / U:0.504 seconds]
    ©2003-2016 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site