Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/3] net: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs | From | "Alex,Shi" <> | Date | Fri, 02 Dec 2011 10:33:20 +0800 |
| |
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 17:00 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:38 +0800, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 15:32 +0800, Alex,Shi a écrit : > > > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them > > > for further code clean up. > > > > > > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better > > > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> > > > --- > > > net/netfilter/xt_TEE.c | 12 ++++++------ > > > net/socket.c | 4 ++-- > > > 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> > > > > Thanks ! > > Anyone like to pick up this patch? or more comments for this?
Kaber, David: I appreciate for your any comments on this. Could you like do me a favor?
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |