[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH 1/3] serial: make bugs field not specific to 8250 type uarts.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 7:51 PM, Alan Cox <> wrote:
>> Make the bugs field part of the globally visible struct
>> uart_port and remove the 8250 specific one.
> Except all the bits in it are 8250 specific things or names that are
> meaningless in generic form - no. I also don't want to encourage flags
> and bug bits. We already have too many and its making the code a mess.
> So right now we want less not more.

The bits in "bugs" are only passed through -- the idea is that there is
no "interpretation" of them by any generic layer -- only that they prop
from the arch down to the driver which knows what they mean.

I can understand the "want less not more" mentality -- I was thinking
the same thing when I was looking at the replication of fields between
uart_port and uart_8250_port, and toying with the idea of helping clean
that up.... (separate topic, to be sure.)

If you have an idea in mind how arch/platform code should cleanly
pass data about known uart bugs to the uart driver, then let me know
what you have in mind. I've no real attachment to what I proposed
here -- it just happened to be the solution I thought would be the least
offensive. If there is a better idea floating around, I'll go ahead and
try to implement it.


> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-serial" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-02 02:35    [W:0.044 / U:58.332 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site