[lkml]   [2011]   [Dec]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v5.1 00/14] crc32c: Add faster algorithm and self-test code
On Wed, Nov 30, 2011 at 02:29:11PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 14:36:59 -0800
> "Darrick J. Wong" <> wrote:
> > This patchset (re)uses Bob Pearson's crc32 slice-by-8 code to stamp out a
> > software crc32c implementation.
> I think the attributions here are all messed up. As the patches stand,
> it appears that you wrote all of them. But I don't think that is the
> case.
> If Bob wrote a particular patch then that patch should be sent with a
> From: Bob Pearson <> right at the start
> of the changelog so that he is recorded as the primary author. If the
> email sender (ie: you) was the primary author then this attribution can
> be omitted and we fall back to using the From: from the email headers.
> Also, every one of these patches should have you own signed-off-by,
> regardless of its authorship. For reasons explained in
> Documentation/SubmittingPatches, section 12.
> Please fix these things up and resend.
> Also, it would be conventional and useful if each patch title was
> prefixed by its subsystem identifier. ie, "removed two instances of
> trailing whitespaces" should be titled "crc32: remove two instances of
> trailing whitespace" or "lib/crc32.c: remove two instances of trailing
> whitespaces".

Okay, I'll massage the changelogs to give them more descriptive subjects, and
fix the attribution chain. Thank you for the feedback.

> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to
> More majordomo info at

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-12-01 21:15    [W:0.083 / U:1.628 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site