lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] KVM: Add wrapper script around QEMU to test kernels
On Sun, Nov 06, 2011 at 08:58:20PM +0200, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> > Ted, I'm confused. Making backwards incompatible ABI changes has never
> > been on the table. Why are you bringing it up?
>
> And btw, KVM tool is not a random userspace project - it was designed
> to live in tools/kvm from the beginning. I've explained the technical
> rationale for sharing kernel code here:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/11/4/150
>
> Please also see Ingo's original rant that started the project:
>
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/962051/focus=962620

Because I don't buy any of these arguments. We have the same kernel
developers working on xfs and xfsprogs, ext4 and e2fsprogs, btrfs and
btrfsprogs, and we don't have those userspace projects in the kernel
source tree.

The only excuse I can see is a hope to make random changes to the
kernel and userspace tools without having to worry about compatibility
problems, which is an argument I've seen with perf (that you have to
use the same version of perf as the kernel version, which to me is bad
software engineering). And that's why I pointed out that you can't do
that with KVM, since we have out-of-tree userspace users, namely
qemu-kvm.

The rest of the arguments are arguments for a new effort, which is
fine --- but not an excuse for putting in the kernel source tree.

- Ted


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-07 00:23    [W:0.238 / U:0.188 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site