[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 2/4] regulator: adapt fixed regulator driver to dt
    On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 01:34:22PM -0700, Olof Johansson wrote:

    > Shouldn't a fixed regulator just be a subset of a fixed one? If so, should the
    > binding be merged with that one?

    No, the fixed voltage regultor is a superset of a general regulator - it
    has additional information like the voltage it supplies and the optional
    enable GPIO.

    > > +- regulator-fixed-enabled-at-boot: 1 = yes, 0 = no

    > Same here, you can drop the prefix. Also, the regular regulators use
    > "regulator-name" for the supply name, it would make sense to reuse the same
    > naming here, right?

    I'm having a hard time associating your second comment with the property
    being discussed - could you clarify please?

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-11-04 22:05    [W:0.018 / U:14.356 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site