Messages in this thread |  | | From | Linus Torvalds <> | | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2011 08:44:21 -0800 | | Subject | Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with given pids |
| |
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> wrote: >>> >>> I think that systemd guys can play with it. E.g. respawning daemons with predefined >>> pids sounds like an interesting thing to play with. >> >> But wouldn't CAP_CHECKPOINT be enough for systemd? > > It would, but what's the point in granting to a systemd (which can be a container's > init by the way) the ability to use the _whole_ checkpoint/restore engine?
Christ, stop making it sound like we would *want* systemd to do even more odd things.
Quite frankly, any feature that is sold with ".. and systemd can use this fox Xyz", is a *misfeature* in my opinion. Core infrastructure like systemd should use a *minimal* interface, not some random extended features.
I'm starting to really dislike this whole feature discussion.
Linus
|  |