lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] fork: Add the ability to create tasks with given pids
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 8:30 AM, Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@parallels.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think that systemd guys can play with it. E.g. respawning daemons with predefined
>>> pids sounds like an interesting thing to play with.
>>
>> But wouldn't CAP_CHECKPOINT be enough for systemd?
>
> It would, but what's the point in granting to a systemd (which can be a container's
> init by the way) the ability to use the _whole_ checkpoint/restore engine?

Christ, stop making it sound like we would *want* systemd to do even
more odd things.

Quite frankly, any feature that is sold with ".. and systemd can use
this fox Xyz", is a *misfeature* in my opinion. Core infrastructure
like systemd should use a *minimal* interface, not some random
extended features.

I'm starting to really dislike this whole feature discussion.

Linus


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-22 17:47    [W:0.092 / U:14.092 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site