Messages in this thread | | | From | Ohad Ben-Cohen <> | Date | Tue, 22 Nov 2011 13:40:04 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework |
| |
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:48:19 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote: >> Modern SoCs typically employ a central symmetric multiprocessing (SMP) >> application processor running Linux, with several other asymmetric >> multiprocessing (AMP) heterogeneous processors running different instances >> of operating system, whether Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS. > > OK, I'm not even sure who this should go through
We shortly discussed this in ELCE, and this can either go through the arm-soc tree or directly to Linus; however Arnd prefers really.
The previous RFC iteration was reviewed quite extensively (especially by Grant. thanks Grant!) but I was hoping to get some more review or feedback on this iteration as well (any form of Acked-by, Reviewed-by, +1-by or No-way-by are welcome).
At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week (minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you, Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3.
>, but no objections here
Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ?
Thanks! Ohad.
| |