lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/7] Introducing a generic AMP framework
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Tue, 25 Oct 2011 11:48:19 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen <ohad@wizery.com> wrote:
>> Modern SoCs typically employ a central symmetric multiprocessing (SMP)
>> application processor running Linux, with several other asymmetric
>> multiprocessing (AMP) heterogeneous processors running different instances
>> of operating system, whether Linux or any other flavor of real-time OS.
>
> OK, I'm not even sure who this should go through

We shortly discussed this in ELCE, and this can either go through the
arm-soc tree or directly to Linus; however Arnd prefers really.

The previous RFC iteration was reviewed quite extensively (especially
by Grant. thanks Grant!) but I was hoping to get some more review or
feedback on this iteration as well (any form of Acked-by, Reviewed-by,
+1-by or No-way-by are welcome).

At this point I know of at least four vendors (besides TI) who are
actively looking into supporting this, and it's getting a bit hard to
collaborate, so I plan to get this into linux-next later this week
(minus the virtio-spec.txt change which I'll send directly to you,
Rusty) in the hope of getting this merged into 3.3.

>, but no objections here

Can I add your Acked-by on the virtio parts (mainly patches 3 and 6) ?

Thanks!
Ohad.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-22 12:43    [W:0.418 / U:0.148 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site