lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [21]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4] PM / Memory-hotplug: Avoid task freezing failures
Date
On Monday, November 21, 2011, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 11:42:54PM +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > The lock_system_sleep() function is used in the memory hotplug code at
> > several places in order to implement mutual exclusion with hibernation.
> > However, this function tries to acquire the 'pm_mutex' lock using
> > mutex_lock() and hence blocks in TASK_UNINTERRUPTIBLE state if it doesn't
> > get the lock. This would lead to task freezing failures and hence
> > hibernation failure as a consequence, even though the hibernation call path
> > successfully acquired the lock.
> >
> > But it is to be noted that, since this task tries to acquire pm_mutex, if it
> > blocks due to this, we are *100% sure* that this task is not going to run
> > as long as hibernation sequence is in progress, since hibernation releases
> > 'pm_mutex' only at the very end, when everything is done.
> > And this means, this task is going to be anyway blocked for much more longer
> > than what the freezer intends to achieve; which means, freezing and thawing
> > doesn't really make any difference to this task!
> >
> > So, to fix freezing failures, we just ask the freezer to skip freezing this
> > task, since it is already "frozen enough".
> >
> > But instead of calling freezer_do_not_count() and freezer_count() as it is,
> > we use only the relevant parts of those functions, because restrictions
> > such as 'the task should be a userspace one' etc., might not be relevant in
> > this scenario.
> >
> > v4: Redesigned the whole fix, to ask the freezer to skip freezing the task
> > which is blocked trying to acquire 'pm_mutex' lock.
> >
> > v3: Tejun suggested avoiding busy-looping by adding an msleep() since
> > it is not guaranteed that we will get frozen immediately.
> >
> > v2: Tejun pointed problems with using mutex_lock_interruptible() in a
> > while loop, when signals not related to freezing are involved.
> > So, replaced it with mutex_trylock().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
>
> Thanks a lot. :)

Applied to linux-pm/linux-next.

Thanks,
Rafael


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-21 23:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans