Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH 2/3] kvm: use this_cpu_xxx replace percpu_xxx funcs | From | "Alex,Shi" <> | Date | Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:02:08 +0800 |
| |
On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 19:05 +0800, Avi Kivity wrote: > On 10/24/2011 04:50 AM, Alex,Shi wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 15:34 +0800, Alex,Shi wrote: > > > percpu_xxx funcs are duplicated with this_cpu_xxx funcs, so replace them > > > for further code clean up. > > > > > > And in preempt safe scenario, __this_cpu_xxx funcs has a bit better > > > performance since __this_cpu_xxx has no redundant preempt_disable() > > > > > > > Avi: > > Would you like to give some comments of this? > > > > Sorry, was travelling: > > Acked-by: Avi Kivity <avi@redhat.com> >
And this one, picking up or comments are all appreciated. :)
| |