lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [2]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH 3/7] drm/i915: Treat PCH eDP like DP in most places
From
On Wed, Nov 2, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
> On Tue,  1 Nov 2011 23:20:26 -0700, Keith Packard <keithp@keithp.com> wrote:
>
>>               intel_dp = enc_to_intel_dp(encoder);
>> -             if (intel_dp->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT) {
>> +             if (intel_dp->base.type == INTEL_OUTPUT_DISPLAYPORT || is_pch_edp(intel_dp)) {
>>                       lane_count = intel_dp->lane_count;
>>                       break;
>> -             } else if (is_edp(intel_dp)) {
>> +             } else if (is_cpu_edp(intel_dp)) {
>>                       lane_count = dev_priv->edp.lanes;
>>                       break;
>
> Thinking about this one more time -- if we ever want to use
> dev_priv->edp.lanes, we should use it in
> intel_dp_max_lane_count. intel_dp_set_m_n should use
> intel_dp->lane_count unconditionally as that's the value we've used
> everywhere else for mode setting.
>
> Perhaps we should use it for monitors that don't include the
> MAX_LANE_COUNT field in the dpcd? Perhaps we should use it on all eDP
> monitors?

FWIW, we rely on the DPCD field for eDP just like DP. Our vbios LCD
tables don't contain DP lane or rate info.

Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-02 20:11    [W:0.071 / U:12.520 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site