lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v4 01/10] arm/tegra: initial device tree for tegra30
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 04:41:13PM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> On 11/14/2011 09:25 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 04:26:30AM +0100, Rob Herring wrote:
> >> On 11/11/2011 05:22 AM, Peter De Schrijver wrote:
> >>> This patch adds the initial device tree for tegra30
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Peter De Schrijver <pdeschrijver@nvidia.com>
> >>> ---
> >>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi | 127 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >>> 1 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi
> >>> new file mode 100644
> >>> index 0000000..fabe243
> >>> --- /dev/null
> >>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra30.dtsi
> >>> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
> >>> +/include/ "skeleton.dtsi"
> >>> +
> >>> +/ {
> >>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30";
> >>
> >> Needs documentation.
> >>
> >>> + interrupt-parent = <&intc>;
> >>> +
> >>> + intc: interrupt-controller@50041000 {
> >>> + compatible = "nvidia,tegra30-gic", "nvidia,tegra20-gic";
> >>> + interrupt-controller;
> >>> + #interrupt-cells = <1>;
> >>
> >> Is the Tegra GIC really different from a standard A9 gic? You need to
> >> update to use the gic binding. The cells should be 3 for example.
> >
> > It has an extra 'legacy' interrupt controller like tegra20 has. This is used
> > when waking up the CPU from power off mode.
>
> Although that is probably not part of the GIC h/w (i.e. at a different
> address) and should be described in the dts separately. That doesn't
> change the GIC binding or the fact that you are using
> arch/arm/common/gic.c though. Whether you have a different compatible
> string or not is not really the issue. That can already be supported if
> necessary. The issue is you are not using the existing GIC binding as a
> starting point and that has implications on every node using a GIC
> interrupt.
>

The GIC is the same as the one used on tegra20. So I copied the binding from
tegra20.dtsi. Is that one wrong too then?

Cheers,

Peter.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-14 17:09    [W:0.036 / U:3.172 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site