lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: 3.2-rc1: INFO: possible recursive locking detected
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 08:43:13AM -0600, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Nov 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 05:05:57PM +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just get below waring when doing:
> > > for i in `seq 1 10`; do ./perf bench -f simple sched messaging -g 40; done
> > >
> > > And kernel config is attached.
> >
> > This appears to me to be the same false positive from the slab allocator
> > that has been seen before. Christoph, any progress on this?
>
> No this is another issue because it is not SLAB but SLUB. Must be a bug
> introduced by the recent merges of the per cpu partial list support.

Ah, OK. Thank you for looking this over and for the suggested solutions!

Thanx, Paul



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-11 16:51    [W:0.056 / U:8.476 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site