lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [10]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] perf_events: fix and improve x86 event scheduling
On 10.11.11 16:09:32, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 10, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> > Just throwing this out there (hasn't event been compiled etc..).
> >
> > The idea is to try the fixed counters first so that we don't
> > 'accidentally' fill a GP counter with something that could have lived on
> > the fixed purpose one and then end up under utilizing the PMU that way.
> >
> > It ought to solve the most common PMU programming fail on Intel
> > thingies.

Peter, what exactly are that Intel constraints you try to solve? Could
you give a short example.

Thanks,

-Robert

--
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Operating System Research Center



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-10 18:01    [W:0.058 / U:0.124 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site