[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PULL] virtio
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 14:42:23 +0200, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 02:33:33PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > A proper solution would be for example a configuration in the PIO config
> > space which points to the MMIO BAR to use instead.
> I think it makes sense to put the configuration in PCI
> configuration space, using vendor-specific capability.
> This way we can reuse existing functionality for scanning
> capability lists.

Patch welcome; first one to implement it becomes virtio PCI maintainer!
I'll keep maintaining the spec, since it covers much more than the PCI
mechanics, but everything I know about PCI I learn from these

Meanwhile, I've dropped this patch; mea culpa.

> > Unless Michael pointed this patch out, it would have broken (at least)
> > the kvm tool in a non obvious way which would require a rather long
> > session of 'git bisect' to figure out whats wrong.

I assumed not, until QEMU provided the second BAR it would simply fall
back. Or am I completely misunderstanding?


 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-02 04:29    [W:0.167 / U:12.020 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site