[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
SubjectRe: [PATCH v6 0/3] security: Yama LSM
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Kees Cook wrote:

> > We probably need to flesh out criteria for inclusion in Yama and document
> > it.
> What's the best way for me to help with that documentation?

Perhaps post a basic document for review. It doesn't have to be a novel.

One thing I'd like to see is making it clear that if a feature is nacked
by a core maintainer, Yama is not a means to bypass that nack. That
maintainer will need to ack it as part of Yama, too.

- James
James Morris

 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-01 22:39    [W:0.063 / U:12.560 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site