Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 2 Nov 2011 08:37:11 +1100 (EST) | From | James Morris <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH v6 0/3] security: Yama LSM |
| |
On Tue, 1 Nov 2011, Kees Cook wrote:
> > We probably need to flesh out criteria for inclusion in Yama and document > > it. > > What's the best way for me to help with that documentation?
Perhaps post a basic document for review. It doesn't have to be a novel.
One thing I'd like to see is making it clear that if a feature is nacked by a core maintainer, Yama is not a means to bypass that nack. That maintainer will need to ack it as part of Yama, too.
- James -- James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
| |