lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Nov]   [1]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: Re: HT (Hyper Threading) aware process scheduling doesn't work as it should
From
are you sure of the cpu terminology? I used few  i7-2600K  machine
and the /proc/cpuinfo shows that the cores thread siblings are 0-4,
1-5, 2-6 and 3-7
can you share your /proc/cpuinfo

On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 2:40 AM, Artem S. Tashkinov <t.artem@lycos.com> wrote:
>> On Oct 31, 2011, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh  wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 30 Oct 2011, Artem S. Tashkinov wrote:
>> > > Please make sure both are set to 0.  If they were not 0 at the time you
>> > > ran your tests, please retest and report back.
>> >
>> > That's 0 & 0 for me.
>>
>> How idle is your system during the test?
>
> load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
>
> As I've mentioned great many times I run this test on a completely idle system
> (i.e. I even `init 3` in advance to avoid any unexpected CPU usage spikes
> caused by unrelated processed).
>
> I have to insist that people conduct this test on their own without trusting my
> words. Probably there's something I overlook or don't fully understand but from
> what I see, there's a serious issue here (at least Microsoft XP and 7 work exactly
> the way I believe an OS should handle such a load).
>
> Artem
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-11-01 06:17    [W:0.078 / U:16.588 seconds]
©2003-2018 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site