lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    SubjectRe: Linux 3.1-rc9
    From
    Date
    On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:50 -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
    > On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
    >
    > > @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times);
    > > static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig)
    > > {
    > > raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock);
    > > + raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock);
    >
    > My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*.
    >
    > Which tree is your patch against? -next or something?

    or something yeah.. tip/master I think.

    > It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right?
    >
    > > sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry
    > patching file include/linux/sched.h
    > Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines).
    > Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines).
    > Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines).
    > patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
    > patching file kernel/sched_stats.h

    yes that would be fine.


    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-08 09:59    [W:5.452 / U:0.048 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site