lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [8]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Linux 3.1-rc9
From
Date
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:50 -0700, Simon Kirby wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times);
> > static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig)
> > {
> > raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock);
> > + raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock);
>
> My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*.
>
> Which tree is your patch against? -next or something?

or something yeah.. tip/master I think.

> It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right?
>
> > sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry
> patching file include/linux/sched.h
> Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines).
> Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines).
> patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
> patching file kernel/sched_stats.h

yes that would be fine.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-08 09:59    [W:0.123 / U:1.108 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site