[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: RFC: virtualbox tainting.
    On Thu, 6 Oct 2011, Dave Jones wrote:

    > > > I feel a bit dirty overloading TAINT_CRAP (even if the name is apropos).
    > > > Should I introduce a TAINT_OUT_OF_TREE perhaps instead ?
    > >
    > > We could do that in a "generic" way by setting a "in-tree" flag type
    > > thing for everything that is built from within the kernel build, and
    > > then taint if that flag is not found.
    > what stops an out of tree module from setting that flag ?

    What stops virtualbox developers from renaming the module in every
    release? That's the same story.

    The only fool-proof way of doing is indeed is the GPG-signing thing.

    Jiri Kosina
    SUSE Labs

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-07 10:03    [W:0.024 / U:74.052 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site