lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Linux 3.1-rc9
On Fri, Oct 07, 2011 at 08:01:55PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> @@ -2571,6 +2573,7 @@ void thread_group_cputimer(struct task_struct *tsk, struct task_cputime *times);
> static inline void thread_group_cputime_init(struct signal_struct *sig)
> {
> raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.lock);
> + raw_spin_lock_init(&sig->cputimer.runtime_lock);

My 3.1-rc9 tree has just spin_lock_init() here, not raw_*.

Which tree is your patch against? -next or something?

It applies with some cooking like this, but will it be right?

> sed s/raw_// ../sched-patch-noraw.diff | patch -p1 --dry
patching file include/linux/sched.h
Hunk #1 succeeded at 503 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #2 succeeded at 512 (offset -1 lines).
Hunk #3 succeeded at 2568 (offset -5 lines).
patching file kernel/posix-cpu-timers.c
patching file kernel/sched_stats.h

Simon-


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-08 02:57    [W:0.093 / U:12.960 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site