Messages in this thread |  | | Date | Thu, 6 Oct 2011 13:06:52 -0700 | | From | Greg KH <> | | Subject | Re: RFC: virtualbox tainting. |
| |
On Thu, Oct 06, 2011 at 03:53:42PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote: > On Thu, 06 Oct 2011 15:50:07 EDT, Dave Jones said: > > > I feel a bit dirty overloading TAINT_CRAP (even if the name is apropos). > > Should I introduce a TAINT_OUT_OF_TREE perhaps instead ? > > That would fix my biggest issue with the patch - it's a slippery slope. But if > we bite the bullet and go straight to the bottom of the slope with an > OUT_OF_TREE taint, I'd be happy with that. > > Is there a good way to identify at modprobe time if a module is in-tree or > out-of-tree?
See my previous email, yes, we can do this.
greg k-h
|  |