[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
Messages in this thread
    SubjectRe: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32

    BFS FAQ writes:

    > NUMA aware?
    > It is NOT NUMA aware in the sense that it does any fancy shit on NUMA, but
    > it will work on NUMA hardware just fine. Only the really big NUMA hardware
    > is likely to suffer in performance, and this is theoretically only, since
    > no one has that sort of hardware to prove it to me, but it seems almost
    > certain.
    This part of FAQ entry was written before 0.300, (i.e. more than 2 years ago)

    > v0.300 onwards have NUMA enhancements.
    And this was added after. =)

    As of now, BFS scheduling is NUMA-aware. (see resched_best_mask())

     \ /
      Last update: 2011-10-04 22:15    [W:0.062 / U:0.932 seconds]
    ©2003-2017 Jasper Spaans. hosted at Digital OceanAdvertise on this site