lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2011]   [Oct]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: big picture UDP/IP performance question re 2.6.18 -> 2.6.32
From
Date
On Tue, 2011-10-04 at 14:16 -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Oct 2011, starlight@binnacle.cx wrote:
> > I've come to the conclusion that Eric is right
> > and the primary issue is an increase in the
> > cost of scheduler context switches. Have
> > been watching this number and it has held
> > pretty close to 200k/sec under all scenarios
> > and kernel versions, so it has to be
> > a longer code-path, bigger cache pressure
> > or both in the scheduler. Sadly this makes
> > newer kernels a no-go for us.
> We had similar experiences. Basically latency constantly gets screwed up
> by the new fancy features being added to the scheduler and network
> subsystem (most notorious is the new "fair" scheduler, 2.6.23 made a big
> step down).

Idly curious, have you compared bfs performance?
http://ck.kolivas.org/patches/bfs/bfs-faq.txt




\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2011-10-04 21:41    [from the cache]
©2003-2011 Jasper Spaans